candy cane: get soft

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shape
Weight: 0.65
, toy
Weight: 0.63
, peppermint
Weight: 0.62
, sweet
Weight: 0.61
, candy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cotton candy
Weight: 0.37
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.35
, toy car
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get soft 1.00
is soft 0.97
go soft 0.97
hard get soft 0.95
is soft now 0.94
be better than soft candy 0.82
hard get sticky 0.78
is weak 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(peppermint, is soft now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, get soft)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, get soft)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(peppermint, is soft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, get soft)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(peppermint, is soft)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(peppermint, is soft now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(peppermint, is soft)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(peppermint, is soft now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rock candy, go soft)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(peppermint, is soft)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(peppermint, is soft now)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(candy cane, get soft)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(rock candy, go soft)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rock candy, go soft)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(candy cane, get soft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, get soft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(peppermint, is soft)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peppermint, is soft now)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(candy, hard get soft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rock candy, go soft)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(peppermint, is soft)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peppermint, is soft now)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(candy cane, get soft)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(candy, hard get soft)