candy cane: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shape
Weight: 0.65
, toy
Weight: 0.63
, peppermint
Weight: 0.62
, sweet
Weight: 0.61
, candy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cotton candy
Weight: 0.37
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.35
, toy car
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
get holes in them 0.99
have legs in them 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(peppermint, get holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy cane, have holes in them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(peppermint, get holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(peppermint, get holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(peppermint, get holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(candy cane, have holes in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(candy cane, have holes in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy cane, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(peppermint, get holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(candy cane, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(peppermint, get holes in them)