candy: be at top of food pyramid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at top of food pyramid 1.00
be at top 0.79
is food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gum, is food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(gum, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(gum, is food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(candy, be at top of food pyramid)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(candy, is food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(candy, is food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(candy, is food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(candy, is food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at top of food pyramid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(candy, be at top of food pyramid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at top of food pyramid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gum, is food)