candy: be dangerous to body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to body 1.00
is harmful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(candy, be dangerous to body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(candy, be dangerous to body)

Similarity expansion

0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy, is harmful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candy, is harmful)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(candy, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, be dangerous to body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(candy, be dangerous to body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(candy, be dangerous to body)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is harmful)