candy: is yummy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is yummy 1.00
be made chewy 0.78
has sweetness sweet 0.78
have different flavors of ness 0.76
is yum 0.76
have flavors of ness 0.76
go sugary 0.76
have flavors 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toffee, go sugary)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gum, be made chewy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cotton candy, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toffee, go sugary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(toffee, go sugary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cotton candy, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cotton candy, has sweetness sweet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(gum, be made chewy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gum, be made chewy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(candy, is yummy)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(candy, has sweetness sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(candy, has sweetness sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(candy, has sweetness sweet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(candy, has sweetness sweet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(candy, is yummy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(toffee, go sugary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cotton candy, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candy, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be made chewy)