candy: want in on george

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
want in on george 1.00
be interested in george 0.91
turn up on acww ds 0.79
be on ah 0.75
make u hungry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(candy, want in on george)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(candy, want in on george)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(candy, want in on george)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(candy, be interested in george)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(candy, be interested in george)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(candy, be interested in george)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candy, be interested in george)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, want in on george)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(candy, want in on george)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(candy, want in on george) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)