cannibal: love eat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.52
, band
Weight: 0.51
, journal
Weight: 0.50
, creature
Weight: 0.43
, thing
Weight: 0.41
Siblings werewolf
Weight: 0.31
, lizard
Weight: 0.31
, crocodile
Weight: 0.31
, cockroach
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
love eat 1.00
love eating 0.94
eat quadraplegics 0.90
hate eating 0.87
prefer eat 0.86
eat people 0.86
eat women 0.81
bother eating 0.81
eating people 0.79
eat blind people 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, eat people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(crocodile, eat people)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(crocodile, eat people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cannibal, love eat)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cannibal, hate eating)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cannibal, eat quadraplegics)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cannibal, hate eating)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, hate eating)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cannibal, eat quadraplegics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, eat quadraplegics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cannibal, eat people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cannibal, hate eating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cannibal, eat women)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, love eating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cannibal, eat women)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, eat women)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cannibal, eat blind people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cannibal, eat blind people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cannibal, eat people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, eat blind people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cannibal, eat quadraplegics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cannibal, love eating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, eat people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cannibal, bother eating)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cannibal, eat people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cannibal, eat blind people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cannibal, love eating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cannibal, bother eating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cannibal, eating people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cannibal, eat women)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, bother eating)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cannibal, eating people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cannibal, love eating)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, eating people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cannibal, bother eating)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cannibal, prefer eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, prefer eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cannibal, prefer eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cannibal, prefer eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cannibal, eating people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cannibal, love eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cannibal, love eat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(crocodile, eat people)