canon: is ethical issues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings biography
Weight: 0.32
, dictionary
Weight: 0.32
, bible
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ethical issues 1.00
is ethical 0.92
is ethical company 0.88
is issues 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(canon, is ethical issues)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(canon, is issues)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(canon, is issues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(canon, is issues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(canon, is ethical)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(canon, is ethical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(canon, is ethical)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(canon, is ethical company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canon, is ethical company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(canon, is ethical company)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(canon, is ethical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(canon, is ethical company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(canon, is issues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(canon, is ethical issues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(canon, is ethical issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(canon, is ethical issues)