cap: be parallel shouting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be parallel shouting 1.00
be considered screaming 0.83
be considered yelling 0.83
come off yells 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cap, be considered screaming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cap, come off yells)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cap, come off yells)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cap, come off yells)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cap, be considered screaming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cap, be considered screaming)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cap, come off yells)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cap, be considered yelling)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cap, be considered yelling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cap, be considered yelling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cap, be considered screaming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cap, be parallel shouting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)