cap: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
has physical part zone 0.78
has physical part ball 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(helmet, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(helmet, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(helmet, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cap, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cap, has physical part ball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cap, has physical part zone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cap, has physical part ball)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cap, has physical part zone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cap, has physical part ball)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cap, has physical part zone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cap, has physical part ball)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cap, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cap, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cap, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cap, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helmet, has physical part holes)