capacitance: be inversely proportional to field

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.54
, parameter
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.51
, test
Weight: 0.49
Siblings voltage
Weight: 0.34
, jitter
Weight: 0.33
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, density
Weight: 0.33
, modulus
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely proportional to field 1.00
be inversely proportional to electric field 0.96
be inversely proportional to distance 0.96
be inversely proportional to voltage 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to electric field)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to electric field)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to electric field)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to voltage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to voltage)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to voltage)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to distance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to distance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to electric field)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to voltage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to distance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to distance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capacitance, be inversely proportional to field)