capacity: affect population

Related concepts

Parents	facility Weight: 0.68 , value Weight: 0.64 , quality Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.60
Siblings	liter Weight: 0.55 , power plant Weight: 0.35 , nuclear power plant Weight: 0.34 , power line Weight: 0.33 , throughput Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect population	1.00
growth of population	0.87
affect society	0.80
affect cities	0.78
affect health	0.76
affect children	0.76
affect change	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(factor, affect children) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(capacity, affect population)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(capacity, affect population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(factor, affect children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect children)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect society)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect cities)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(factor, affect children) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(capacity, affect population)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(capacity, affect population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect society) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, affect society)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, affect cities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(capacity, affect population)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(capacity, growth of population)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(capacity, growth of population)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(capacity, growth of population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(capacity, growth of population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(capacity, affect population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(factor, affect health)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(factor, affect children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, affect society)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, affect cities)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(factor, affect health)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(capacity, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(factor, affect children)