capital: affect economic development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, revenue
Weight: 0.59
, stock
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.33
, investment
Weight: 0.33
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.33
, city hall
Weight: 0.33
, empire state building
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economic development 1.00
affect development 0.92
contribute to development 0.84
be important to business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, affect economic development)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(stock, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, affect economic development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(stock, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capital, affect economic development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(capital, affect economic development)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(capital, affect development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(capital, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(capital, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(capital, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(capital, affect development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(capital, contribute to development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capital, contribute to development)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(capital, affect development)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(capital, contribute to development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(capital, contribute to development)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, affect economic development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stock, be important to business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stock, be important to business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(capital, affect economic development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)