capricorn: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sign
Weight: 0.47
, taurus
Weight: 0.41
, virgo
Weight: 0.39
, goat
Weight: 0.35
, time
Weight: 0.35
Siblings pisces
Weight: 0.39
, stop sign
Weight: 0.27
, american sign language
Weight: 0.27
, street sign
Weight: 0.26
, reading
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
have bad reputation 0.81
has quality evil 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taurus, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taurus, have bad reputation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taurus, have bad reputation)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reading, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(reading, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taurus, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(reading, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(reading, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(reading, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reading, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(capricorn, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(capricorn, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(capricorn, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(capricorn, have bad reputation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(capricorn, have bad reputation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality evil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(capricorn, has quality evil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(capricorn, have bad reputation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(capricorn, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(taurus, have bad reputation)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(reading, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(reading, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capricorn, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(taurus, have bad reputation)