car accident: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.77
, tragedy
Weight: 0.70
, emergency
Weight: 0.67
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.69
, collision
Weight: 0.59
, plane crash
Weight: 0.40
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.40
, crash
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
become problem 0.88
is suddenly problem 0.86
has state care 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(emergency, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(emergency, has state care)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(emergency, has state care)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(emergency, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(car accident, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(car accident, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(emergency, has state care)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(emergency, has state care)