carbon monoxide: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.74
, molecule
Weight: 0.72
, carbon
Weight: 0.71
, water vapor
Weight: 0.71
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.84
, methane
Weight: 0.68
, hydrocarbon
Weight: 0.59
, smog
Weight: 0.56
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(methane, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(water vapor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(methane, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(methane, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(methane, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(water vapor, be bad for environment)