card: be banned in yugioh

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents smart card
Weight: 0.90
, business card
Weight: 0.79
, credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sound card
Weight: 0.79
, wild card
Weight: 0.77
, trading card
Weight: 0.75
, green card
Weight: 0.70
, visa card
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in yugioh 1.00
is banned 0.99
is are banned 0.94
count banned 0.88
be banned in magic 0.86
be forbidden in yugioh 0.84
be banned by casinos 0.80
get suspended 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(debit card, get suspended)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(debit card, get suspended)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(debit card, get suspended)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(visa card, is are banned)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(debit card, get suspended)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(visa card, is are banned)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(visa card, is are banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(card, be banned in yugioh)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(card, is banned)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(card, is banned)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(card, be forbidden in yugioh)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(card, be forbidden in yugioh)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(card, be banned in magic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(card, be banned in magic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in magic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(card, be forbidden in yugioh)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(card, is banned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(card, is banned)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(card, be forbidden in yugioh)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(card, be banned in magic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(debit card, get suspended)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(visa card, is are banned)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(card, be banned in yugioh)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(debit card, get suspended)