card: be flat and rectangular

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.66
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wild card
Weight: 0.77
, visa card
Weight: 0.68
, index card
Weight: 0.65
, payment
Weight: 0.63
, id
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be flat and rectangular 1.00
be rectangular 0.94
has rectangular shape 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(credit card, has rectangular shape)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(credit card, be rectangular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(credit card, be rectangular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(credit card, has rectangular shape)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be rectangular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has rectangular shape)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(credit card, be rectangular)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(credit card, has rectangular shape)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(card, be flat and rectangular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(credit card, be rectangular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(credit card, has rectangular shape)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(credit card, be rectangular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(card, be flat and rectangular)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(credit card, has rectangular shape)