cardboard: be recycle

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cardboard box
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings styrofoam
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be recycle 1.00
be at recycle bin 0.92
be recycle into new product 0.88
be at waste bin 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cardboard box, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cardboard, be recycle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cardboard box, be recycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cardboard box, be recycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be recycle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cardboard box, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(styrofoam, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be recycle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cardboard, be recycle)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be recycle into new product)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cardboard, be at recycle bin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cardboard, be at recycle bin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cardboard, be recycle into new product)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be at recycle bin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be at recycle bin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cardboard, be recycle into new product)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle into new product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cardboard, be recycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cardboard box, be recycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be recycle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cardboard, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cardboard box, be recycle)