cardboard: damage environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cardboard box
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings styrofoam
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
damage environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.77
pollute environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cardboard, damage environment)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cardboard, pollute environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cardboard, pollute environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cardboard, damage environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)