cardboard: pollute environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cardboard box
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings styrofoam
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
pollute environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.78
damage environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cardboard, pollute environment)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, damage environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cardboard, damage environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cardboard, damage environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cardboard, damage environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cardboard, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cardboard, pollute environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)