cardinal: be more colorful than cardinals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.61
, bishop
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pope
Weight: 0.54
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.35
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.35
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more colorful than cardinals 1.00
be more colorful than female cardinals 0.98
is cardinals 0.93
be called cardinals 0.93
is then cardinals 0.92
is prettier cardinals 0.91
is female cardinals 0.91
is prettier then cardinals 0.91
is then female cardinals 0.91
is prettier female cardinals 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(catholic priest, be called cardinals)