cardinal: has physical part beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.61
, bishop
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pope
Weight: 0.54
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.35
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.35
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beak 1.00
have short beak 0.93
have short stout beak 0.84
spread tail feathers 0.76
have feathers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bird, have feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bird, have feathers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bird, have feathers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, have feathers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bird, have feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(golden eagle, have feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, have feathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cardinal, has physical part beak)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cardinal, have feathers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cardinal, have feathers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, have feathers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cardinal, have feathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bird, have feathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(golden eagle, have feathers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cardinal, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bird, have feathers)