cardinal: is cardinals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.61
, bishop
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pope
Weight: 0.54
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.35
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.35
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cardinals 1.00
be called cardinals 0.99
is then cardinals 0.99
is female cardinals 0.96
is then female cardinals 0.95
be more colorful than cardinals 0.93
be more colorful than female cardinals 0.90
is prettier cardinals 0.90
is prettier then cardinals 0.90
is prettier female cardinals 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than cardinals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cardinal, be more colorful than female cardinals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(catholic priest, be called cardinals)