care: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hospital care
Weight: 0.74
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, infection
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.33
, shelter
Weight: 0.32
, doctor office
Weight: 0.32
, comfort
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
eat bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(care, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shelter, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(shelter, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(comfort, eat bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(care, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(shelter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shelter, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(comfort, eat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(comfort, eat bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(shelter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shelter, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(care, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(care, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(shelter, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shelter, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(comfort, eat bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(care, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)