carnivore: be at top of food chain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at top of food chain 1.00
get food 0.81
get energy from food 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, get food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(snow leopard, get food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, get food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(carnivore, be at top of food chain)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carnivore, get food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(carnivore, get energy from food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(carnivore, get food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(carnivore, get energy from food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(carnivore, get food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(carnivore, get energy from food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, get food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, get energy from food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at top of food chain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carnivore, be at top of food chain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at top of food chain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(snow leopard, get food)