carnivore: has physical part canines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part canines 1.00
have canines 0.95
have well developed canines 0.91
have long strong canines 0.91
have sharp canines 0.90
have long pointy canines 0.85
need canine teeth 0.84
need sharp canine teeth 0.82
make good pets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(carnivore, have canines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(carnivore, have canines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long pointy canines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)