carnivore: have canines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have canines 1.00
has physical part canines 0.95
have well developed canines 0.92
have sharp canines 0.92
have long strong canines 0.91
have long pointy canines 0.88
need canine teeth 0.86
need sharp canine teeth 0.81
make good pets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(carnivore, have canines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have canines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(carnivore, have canines)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(carnivore, have canines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(carnivore, have canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)