carnivore: have long strong canines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long strong canines 1.00
have canines 0.91
have sharp canines 0.91
have well developed canines 0.91
has physical part canines 0.91
have long pointy canines 0.88
need sharp canine teeth 0.82
need canine teeth 0.81
make good pets 0.80
have long sharp claws 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(predator, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(predator, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(carnivore, have canines)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(carnivore, have canines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have canines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need canine teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long sharp claws)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have sharp canines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(carnivore, have long sharp claws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have long sharp claws)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have well developed canines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long pointy canines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part canines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have canines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need sharp canine teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long sharp claws)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need canine teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(carnivore, have long strong canines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)