carnivore: live in forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in forests 1.00
live in forest 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in forests)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bear, live in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, live in forests)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, live in forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bear, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bear, live in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(carnivore, live in forests)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(carnivore, live in forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(carnivore, live in forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carnivore, live in forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carnivore, live in forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, live in forests)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, live in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, live in forests)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bear, live in forest)