carpenter: has physical part hands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hands 1.00
have big hands 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(construction worker, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(construction worker, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has physical part hands)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(construction worker, have big hands)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, have big hands)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has physical part hands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(construction worker, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(construction worker, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, have big hands)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(carpenter, have big hands)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(carpenter, have big hands)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, have big hands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction worker, has physical part hands)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, have big hands)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction worker, has physical part hands)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, have big hands)