carpenter: wear pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear pants 1.00
wear white pants 0.98
wear flannel 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(construction worker, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear pants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear pants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white pants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear pants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(construction worker, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carpenter, wear pants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electrician, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear pants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(painter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(painter, wear pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(painter, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(carpenter, wear pants)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear white pants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(carpenter, wear white pants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(carpenter, wear white pants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear flannel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(carpenter, wear flannel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(carpenter, wear flannel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear white pants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear flannel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painter, wear pants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(electrician, wear pants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(painter, wear white pants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(carpenter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear pants)