carpet: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
Siblings berber
Weight: 0.50
, flooring
Weight: 0.35
, linoleum
Weight: 0.35
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, rug
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(carpet, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(carpet, is insulator)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(carpet, is insulator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(carpet, is insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpet, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)