carrot: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tuber
Weight: 0.65
, fresh food
Weight: 0.63
, fruit
Weight: 0.61
, root
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carrot juice
Weight: 0.37
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.34
, crab apple
Weight: 0.34
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
has quality good 0.80
be good for eyes 0.79
be good for dogs 0.78
be good for vision 0.77
go quickly bad 0.77
do 0.77
be good for night vision 0.76
be in everything 0.76
be bad for dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be in everything)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(apple juice, be in everything)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be in everything)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(carrot, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be bad for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(carrot, be bad for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carrot, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(apple juice, be in everything)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carrot, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)