cartel: fail in long run

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.56
, form
Weight: 0.48
, act
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, gang
Weight: 0.46
Siblings terrorist organization
Weight: 0.32
, militia
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, clan
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in long run 1.00
fail in run 0.96
fail over time 0.89
fail 0.89
break down in long run 0.83
be unstable in long run 0.81
break down in run 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cartel, fail in long run)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cartel, fail in run)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cartel, fail in run)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cartel, fail in run)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cartel, fail in run)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cartel, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cartel, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cartel, fail over time)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartel, fail over time)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cartel, fail over time)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartel, fail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cartel, fail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cartel, fail over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cartel, break down in long run)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cartel, break down in run)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cartel, break down in long run)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cartel, break down in run)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cartel, break down in long run)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cartel, break down in long run)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cartel, break down in run)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cartel, be unstable in long run)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cartel, break down in run)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cartel, be unstable in long run)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cartel, be unstable in long run)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cartel, be unstable in long run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cartel, fail in long run)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cartel, fail in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cartel, fail in long run)