cartoon network: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network
Weight: 0.83
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, cartoon
Weight: 0.69
, company
Weight: 0.65
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.40
, neural network
Weight: 0.37
, television
Weight: 0.36
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is quality 0.87
is bad now 0.84
is really bad 0.83
is really bad now 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cartoon, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cartoon, is bad now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, is bad now)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cartoon, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(television, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is really bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is really bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cartoon network, is really bad now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cartoon network, is quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cartoon network, is really bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is really bad now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is really bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is really bad now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is really bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cartoon, is bad now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cartoon, is bad now)