cartoon network: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network
Weight: 0.83
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, cartoon
Weight: 0.69
, company
Weight: 0.65
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.40
, neural network
Weight: 0.37
, television
Weight: 0.36
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(television, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(television, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cartoon network, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)