cartoon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.63
, film
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cartoon network
Weight: 0.69
, anime
Weight: 0.66
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.66
, comic strip
Weight: 0.62
, ren
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad now 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ren, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ren, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ren, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cartoon network, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is bad now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cartoon, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cartoon, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cartoon, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cartoon, is bad now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, is bad now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ren, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is bad now)