cartridge: be more profitable than printers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.58
, ammunition
Weight: 0.58
Siblings device
Weight: 0.66
, disposable razor
Weight: 0.33
, carton
Weight: 0.33
, pouch
Weight: 0.33
, computer disk
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more profitable than printers 1.00
be cheaper online than than store 0.76
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.76
is more efficient 0.76
be in stores more costly today 0.76
be in market expensive 0.75
get more expensive 0.75
sell more than retail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(container, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(container, is more efficient)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(container, is more efficient)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cartridge, be more profitable than printers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)