carving: has quality change

Related concepts

Parents	art Weight: 0.61 , detail Weight: 0.54 , method Weight: 0.52 , material Weight: 0.52
Siblings	painting Weight: 0.33 , etching Weight: 0.33 , calligraphy Weight: 0.33 , quilting Weight: 0.32 , needlework Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality change	1.00
has quality bad	0.86
is physical change	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(carving, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(painting, is physical change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(painting, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(quilting, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(carving, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(painting, is physical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(painting, is physical change)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(painting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(painting, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(quilting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(quilting, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(carving, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(carving, has quality bad)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(carving, is physical change)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(carving, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(carving, is physical change)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(carving, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(carving, is physical change)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(carving, is physical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(carving, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(painting, is physical change)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(painting, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(quilting, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(carving, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)