case: go to trial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.64
, type
Weight: 0.63
, instance
Weight: 0.62
, piece
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cold case
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.61
, nelson
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
go to trial 1.00
go to jury 0.81
go to grand jury 0.78
favour prosecution side 0.78
go to court 0.77
go to high court 0.75
go to federal court 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, favour prosecution side)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(grand jury, favour prosecution side)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(grand jury, favour prosecution side)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(case, go to trial)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(case, go to grand jury)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(case, go to high court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(case, go to federal court)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(case, go to high court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(case, go to federal court)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(case, go to grand jury)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(case, go to high court)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(case, go to high court)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(case, go to federal court)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(case, go to grand jury)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(case, go to federal court)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(case, go to grand jury)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(case, go to trial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(case, go to trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(case, go to trial)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(grand jury, favour prosecution side)