cash: be better than bitcoin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debit card
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, information
Weight: 0.59
, investment
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.33
, financial
Weight: 0.32
, smart card
Weight: 0.32
, stock
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bitcoin 1.00
be better than credit 0.86
has quality better 0.86
be better than credit cards 0.79
be more important than profit 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit cards)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than credit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be more important than profit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cash, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cash, be better than credit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cash, be more important than profit)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cash, be better than credit cards)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cash, be more important than profit)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cash, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cash, be more important than profit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)