cash: be profitable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debit card
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, information
Weight: 0.59
, investment
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.33
, financial
Weight: 0.32
, smart card
Weight: 0.32
, stock
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be profitable 1.00
be more important than profit 0.77
be important to company 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cash, be profitable)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be more important than profit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cash, be more important than profit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cash, be more important than profit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cash, be important to company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cash, be important to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cash, be important to company)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cash, be important to company)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cash, be more important than profit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cash, be profitable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cash, be profitable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cash, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)