cashew: be better than peanuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.55
, nut
Weight: 0.48
, plantation
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cassava
Weight: 0.37
, banana
Weight: 0.36
, paddy
Weight: 0.36
, pineapple
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than peanuts 1.00
be more expensive than peanuts 0.96
cost more than peanuts 0.94
be more expensive than almonds 0.79
be better than roasted 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nut, be better than roasted)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nut, be better than roasted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nut, be better than roasted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nut, be better than roasted)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cashew, be more expensive than almonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be more expensive than almonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cashew, be more expensive than almonds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cashew, be more expensive than almonds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cashew, be better than roasted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cashew, be better than roasted)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be better than roasted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cashew, be better than roasted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nut, be better than roasted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cashew, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nut, be better than roasted)