cashier: be at market

Related concepts

Parents	job Weight: 0.60 , cash Weight: 0.56 , people Weight: 0.55 , customer Weight: 0.55 , grocery store Weight: 0.54
Siblings	clerk Weight: 0.35 , convenience store Weight: 0.35 , waiter Weight: 0.34 , supermarket Weight: 0.34 , food store Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at market	1.00
price product	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(customer, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(cashier, be at market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(customer, be at market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at market)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(clerk, price product)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(customer, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(cashier, be at market)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(clerk, price product) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(clerk, price product)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(cashier, be at market)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(cashier, price product)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(cashier, price product)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(cashier, price product)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cashier, price product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(cashier, be at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(customer, be at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(clerk, price product)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(cashier, be at market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(customer, be at market)