cashier: be necessary in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary in business 1.00
is necessary 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(occupation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashier, be necessary in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(occupation, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(occupation, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(occupation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cashier, be necessary in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cashier, be necessary in business)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cashier, is necessary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cashier, is necessary)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cashier, is necessary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cashier, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be necessary in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashier, be necessary in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(occupation, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cashier, be necessary in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(occupation, is necessary)