cashier: change

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, people
Weight: 0.55
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, grocery store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, supermarket
Weight: 0.34
, food store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
change 1.00
return change 0.88
short change you 0.85
change customer 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(clerk, return change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(clerk, return change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(clerk, return change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cashier, change)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cashier, short change you)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cashier, change customer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cashier, short change you)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cashier, short change you)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, change customer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cashier, change customer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cashier, short change you)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cashier, change customer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cashier, change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cashier, change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cashier, change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(clerk, return change)