cashier: has check

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has check 1.00
be safe check 0.88
have checks 0.85
on checks 0.85
have expensive checks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cashier, has check)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be safe check)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cashier, on checks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cashier, have checks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cashier, on checks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cashier, on checks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cashier, have checks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cashier, have checks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cashier, on checks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cashier, be safe check)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cashier, be safe check)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cashier, be safe check)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cashier, has check)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cashier, has check)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cashier, has check)