cashier: hate jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate jobs 1.00
jobs 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bartender, jobs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, jobs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(receptionist, jobs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(receptionist, jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, jobs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(waiter, jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bartender, jobs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bartender, jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cashier, hate jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cashier, jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cashier, jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cashier, jobs)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cashier, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cashier, hate jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(receptionist, jobs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(waiter, jobs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashier, hate jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bartender, jobs)