cashier: have checks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have checks 1.00
on checks 0.99
have expensive checks 0.95
has check 0.85
be safe check 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cashier, have checks)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cashier, on checks)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cashier, on checks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cashier, has check)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cashier, on checks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be safe check)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cashier, on checks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cashier, has check)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cashier, has check)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cashier, has check)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cashier, be safe check)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cashier, have expensive checks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cashier, be safe check)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cashier, be safe check)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cashier, have expensive checks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have checks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cashier, have checks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cashier, have checks)